Rated Event: 47.7%
AWildRover wrote:
By current cyclosportive standards this one is a bit below par. It's a sportive that feels like it's being run on a shoestring and offers the rider poor VFM. The whole sportive seems to have been organised with the minimum levels of staffing and support. Once again you feel that a cycling club which in the past might have organised a cheap, no frills early-season reliability ride has jumped on the sportive bandwagon in order to charge much higher prices, attract a lot more riders from a wider population than the usual cycling club fraternity (very few female cyclists incidentally), and rake in more money for the club coffers. Seasoned riders from traditional cycling clubs would probably be ok with this, but I can see why others would be disappointed and might want to look elsewhere for a good sportive experience.
No route map provided at the start - we were told to print one off the website, which turned out to be a very small-scale OS map with the route drawn over it by hand. I never found the GPS route map, despite the website suggesting that one might be provided.
Surprised by how early the refreshment stop was - after only 25 miles of a 78 mile ride. If there's going to be only one stop provided (perhaps there should have been two), it's better if this is done at the halfway point or a bit later - psychologically better to have got the main part of the ride over before stopping. In the case of the Spring Onion route, that would have the advantage of positioning the stop after the rather hilly southernmost section of the course through The Mens/Bedham. The refreshment stop itself seemed very constricted and congested, tucked in to the entrance to a pub and hemmed in by a van. No gels or drinks as promised, only some cake and halves of banana. No toilet facilities that I could see.
Some stretches of road that we rode over had very poor surfaces and great care needed to be taken in places not to hit potholes at speed. Unfortunately such conditions are going to be inevitable when you try - I think correctly - to take cyclists down attractive country roads rather than busy main roads in an area where the local councils - Surrey and West Sussex - haven't got the cash to carry out many road repairs. I passed many cyclists with punctures throughout the route, and counted myself lucky to finish with the bike intact. But to be fair the conditions were no different to those we've been used to riding in all winter.
To my surprise, the red route markings painted on the road generally worked well, but I did almost miss one turning, and I saw a cyclist way ahead of me who had apparently carried straight on. Marshalling was virtually non-existent. My wife, who was waiting to catch sight of me along the route, took it upon herself to do some impromptu marshalling at the complicated and busy junction with the A281 near Rudgwick after she saw cyclists going astray. Also there were no signs. I didn't see any signs anywhere warning cyclists of dangerous corners. Nor did I see any signs anywhere warning motorists that there were cyclists on the road, as one sees at other cycling events - was this deliberate?
I had no problem with the climb of Whitedown occurring near the end of the ride. I knew it was coming, and I had prepared myself for it, taking care to leave something in the tank; it turned out to be an easier climb than I expected. However, I was surprised by how many motor vehicles were going up and down this single-track lane. Some forced their way up past wobbling cyclists, which struck me as dangerous. The road seems to be used as a cut-through by motorists.
I didn't have a problem with the route using the A248 and A25 on the approach to Whitedown. I was quite glad for some good roads, although there were hold-ups because of traffic congestion - mostly as cars negotiated their way past cyclists further up the road!
A strong point was that there was lots of car parking. That said, I was initially directed, along with many other drivers, into a car park that was already full. I then had to guess where the rest of the car parking was (again, minimal marshalling, no signs).
The start went smoothly, despite the number of riders waiting to leave, and the finish was smooth too. The people here and elsewhere were friendly and chatty, which was welcome.
I found the football club bar area rather congested after the ride. There were long queues, it was difficult to find somewhere to sit, and there was a poor selection of food for sale.
Overall, despite some of my more negative comments above, I liked the route and I enjoyed the ride! Thanks to SWRC for organising it!